Certified Maintenance & Reliability Professional (CMRP) Practice Exam

What benefit is associated with having planned work compared to reactive work?

1. Planned work is more expensive

2. Planned work leads to fewer tool requirements

3. Planned work costs two to three times less

4. Planned work is more time-consuming

The correct answer is: Planned work costs two to three times less

Planned work is associated with a substantial reduction in costs, often being two to three times less expensive than reactive work. This cost efficiency arises from several factors inherent in planned maintenance. When work is planned, it allows for better resource allocation, including labor and materials, as tasks can be scheduled during non-peak hours or during downtime. This proactive approach also reduces the urgency and chaos that typically accompany unplanned breakdowns, leading to better decision-making regarding repairs or maintenance actions. Additionally, planned work allows for the identification and mitigation of potential issues before they escalate into larger problems that require emergency responses. This preventative focus is not only beneficial for managing expenses but also enhances operational efficiency and equipment reliability, further contributing to lower overall costs. This contrasts with reactive work, which can lead to increased spending due to emergency repairs, unplanned downtime, and the costs associated with expedited parts or labor. While there are challenges and limitations in both planned and reactive maintenance, the economic advantages of planned work stand out significantly. This understanding highlights the importance of planning as a critical element of effective maintenance management.